Standard Chartered Expected to Pay $330 Million for Breaking Iran Sanctions

Yet another bank is being fined for violating U.S. sanctions by conducting business with Iran. According to Reuters, Asian-focused bank Standard Chartered is expected to pay $330 million to settle a case with U.S. regulators.

The Department of Financial Service (DFS), New York’s banking regulator, said Standard Chartered hid financial transactions with Iran. The bank agreed to pay the civil penalty after DFS issued a threat to revoke its license to do business in New York.

This case is a prime example of why even banks need to have a structured and automated approach to compliance. Whether or not they involve the actual exchange of goods, companies should screen all international transactions. This precaution not only safeguards brand reputation, but can also prevent the withdrawal of trading rights, which can result in a drop in stock price and profits.

EmailPrintFacebookTwitterDeliciousDiggEvernoteGoogle+LinkedInPinterestRedditStumbleUponTumblrBookmark/FavoritesShare

EU Cuts Syria Sanctions Term

The European Union will reduce its renewal term for sanctions on Syria to three months from an expected year. EU diplomats think that doing so will make it easier to equip rebels fighting to depose President Bashar al-Assad.

The current sanctions package is scheduled to expire on December 1, and consists of:

  • Visa bans and asset freezes on individuals and businesses connected to Assad’s government
  • A ban on oil imports from Syria
  • An embargo on the supply of arms to the country, imposed to prevent the flow of weapons to Assad’s forces

Ambassadors from the 27 EU member states decided to review the whole package of sanctions every three months, from here on out.

“This sends a strong message to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad that all options remain on the table and makes clear the need for real change,” a British Foreign Office spokeswoman said.

Read this Reuters article to learn more.

US Senate Unanimous in Vote for Tougher Sanctions Against Iran

On November 30, 2012, the United States’ Senate passed the Menendez amendment (SA 3232) adding stronger Iran sanctions to the National Defense Authorization Act. Key features of the amendment, drafted by Senators Robert Menendez, Mark Kirk, and Joe Lieberman, according to Robert Menendez’ website, are that it:

  • Designates Iran’s energy, port, shipping, and ship-building sectors as entities of proliferation due to the role they play in supporting and funding Iran’s proliferation activities
  • Imposes sanctions on persons selling or supplying a defined list of commodities to Iran – commodities that are relevant to Iran’s ship-building and nuclear sectors such as graphite, aluminum, steel, metallurgical coal and software for integrating industrial processes
  • Designates the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting entity and its President as human rights abusers for their broadcasting of forced televised confession and show trials

It adds that:

To address concerns about access to humanitarian goods in Iran there are exceptions for the provision and sale to Iran of food, agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices and other humanitarian goods AND the amendment imposes new human rights sanctions on those in Iran who are engaged in corruption or the diversion of resources related to these goods and that are preventing them for [sic] reaching the Iranian people.

Responding to the Senate’s vote in favor of the amendment (by 94-0), Menendez said, “I applaud my colleagues…for joining us in sending a clear message to Iran: you can’t just try to wait us out. The waiting game is over and, in the end, one way or the other, Iran will not be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon with which to threaten the United States, Israel, the region, and the world.”

Michael Burton, partner at the law firm Arent Fox and co-chair of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee said:

“The Senate has yet to pass the NDAA, but as they obtained closure on December 3, the vote on final passage may occur soon. And then the House must agree to it – it’s possible a conference would have to be convened – so passage isn’t a sure thing yet.”

Source: http://www.worldecr.com/news