Understanding the Recent Ruling on Conflict Minerals

Existing Global Trade Management and Supply Chain Technology will need to Adapt to these Regulations

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed regulations that require US and certain foreign companies to report the use of “conflict minerals” from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or adjoining countries in their products.

Conflict minerals are mined under conditions of armed conflict and human rights abuse. Areas notably affected are in the eastern parts of Africa, where various armed rebel groups within the DRC are largely responsible for using these natural resources to finance continued fighting, but neighboring countries such as Burundi, Rwanda and Uganda have also profited significantly. Conflict minerals mined in the DRC are typically passed through various intermediaries before being finally purchased.

At present, four minerals are listed as conflict minerals:

  • Columbite-tantalite, or commonly known as Coltan – used primarily in the production of capacitors, hearing aids, pacemakers, airbags, GPS, ignition systems, anti-lock braking systems, laptop computers, mobile phones, video game consoles, cameras, etc.
  • Cassiterite – used in production of tin, a common component of biocides, fungicides, high performance paint manufacturing, etc.
  • Wolframite – an important source of tungsten, used in fishing weights, dart tips and golf club heads, in addition to use in other metalworking tools.
  • Gold – used in jewelry, electronics and dental products.

In practical terms, what does this ruling mean for companies whose products use these minerals? According to the National Retail Federation, the regulations will apply not only to manufacturers but also to retailers considered to be “contracting to manufacture” private-label merchandise.

A retailer simply placing its brand on a generic product would not be covered, but those that have “some actual influence over the manufacturing of that product” would be covered, NRF explained. Retailers selling only third-party merchandise under the product’s own brand rather than the store’s brand are not affected. Companies are able to avoid the disclosure rules if they use recycled or scrap minerals.Companies will have until May 31, 2014, to make their first disclosures about whether the minerals they use are “conflict free,” meaning they did not finance or benefit armed groups in Central Africa. And for two years — four years for smaller firms — companies will be able to disclose simply that they could not determine whether the minerals were helping to finance fighting in the DRC.

Final Thoughts

Existing global trade management and supply chain technology will need to adapt to these regulations. Here are some initial steps companies can take to ensure they are ready for compliance in 2014:

  • Ensure that your source of global trade content lists sanctions against the conflict mineral countries and the minerals themselves.
  • Consider using questionnaires or surveys to determine whether your product suppliers are obtaining minerals from conflicted areas. Much the same way that suppliers certify eligibility for preferential duty treatment, they can also certify that their products do not contain conflict minerals.
  • Perform admissibility reviews on transactions that contain the minerals or products made with the minerals.
  • Update your standard operating procedures to include processes for requesting and capturing declarations from suppliers and for performing transaction reviews.

 

EmailPrintFacebookTwitterDeliciousDiggEvernoteGoogle+LinkedInPinterestRedditStumbleUponTumblrBookmark/FavoritesShare

Managing Multiple Sourcing in Your Global Trade Management Solution

Procurement, Compliance and Logistics Professionals all play Important Roles in ordering Products

Global importers simply don’t have the option of depending on a single supplier for a variety of items. Both the demands of supply chain resiliency and the reality of maintaining stock levels make it necessary to obtain the same item from multiple suppliers. Particularly if you are a global retailer or manufacturer with distributed outlets or plants, it’s neither practical nor possible to source all units from a single vendor.

This is where the concept of multiple sourcing comes in — literally buying items from more than one source. While multiple sourcing is straightforward in theory, as a practice it is more complex from a global trade management perspective, including implications for landed cost, compliance and logistics.

Consider the example of a large global retailer that is purchasing a basic white t-shirt for thousands of retail outlets located in ten countries. The retailer has four different suppliers, each in a different country, capable of fulfilling t-shirt orders. What are the implications of placing an order with each of these suppliers to ensure adequate global stock levels of the white t-shirt?

  • Landed cost — Each shipment of shirts will have a different landed cost associated with it since it will be coming from and to a different country. Freight, insurance, duties and taxes all play a role in determining landed cost, and there may also be preferential trade programs, countervailing or anti-dumping duties in place between some of these countries.
  • Compliance — Each country has different regulations in place for importation of the white t-shirt. This can include rules around fiber content, bleaches or chemicals used in the manufacturing process, labeling requirements and subtleties in product classification. Agencies other than Customs may be involved, and each government has its own set of import filing forms and rules.
  • Logistics — Getting the shirts from manufacturer to retail outlet is no small task. Each shipment must be rated and booked, and multiple land and sea carriers will need to be managed and tracked.

A global trade management system should inherently and intuitively approach the complexities of multiple sourcing of goods at the product level. This means that it needs to store information about the multiple sources and account for all the permutations in a single product record. It also needs to perform import cost calculations and check compliance for all the relevant country of import/country of export combinations.

Final Thoughts

Procurement, compliance and logistics professionals all play important roles in ordering products. Access to a centralized repository of sourcing information via a GTM system makes it possible for these professionals to place orders in an efficient and compliant manner.